Invoking the Lord (the first call) | Chad Brooks


I’ve been writing about a Biblical theme I’ve been fascinated with for years. “Calling on the Lord.”

Email 1 | Calling on God as Fundamental
Email 2 | Exactly what does Calling on God look like?

I shared earlier that we see it for the first time in Genesis 4:26, and it repeats almost exactly in Genesis 12:8. If we want to get nerdy (and you know I do), we are talking about the Hebrew verb קָרָא. The root shows up over 200 times in the Old Testament.

This word has many different meanings: calling, invoking, summoning, sending for, proclaiming, granting, and a few others (depending on the translation you are reading). I think to begin to get the bigger idea, we have to look at how it is used in these two Genesis passages.

In Genesis 4, we read about humans first calling on the name of the LORD after the cursing of Cain, his lineage, and the story turns back to Adam and Eve with the birth of their son Seth. This particular Hebrew verb is also used to describe naming something or someone. It shows up all over chapter 1. It’s inside these weird complications I get fascinated.

But Genesis 4:26. The NRSV uses the term “invoked,” and most other translations say “call”. I like the NRSV translation of this passage because it quickly gets us into the meat of the specific idea. One quality of this word is “establishing contact with someone”. It isn’t unlike the idea of hollering for someone for a specific reason. We are inviting someone into a situation.

If we look at the larger narrative of Genesis 2-4, a bunch is happening. Adam and Eve are created, live in the Garden, fall into sin, Cain and Abel happen, we see this alternate line of Cain developed, a new son is born, and there seems to be some sort of reset in the original line of humanity.

So why are they first now calling on God?

This is where it gets interesting. There is a larger theological argument for what is called “the ontological necessity of the incarnation.” This means there is something about the character of God as providing grace and a power that humans are incapable of self-generating. God, because of His character, has to intervene with humanity in a way that provides grace. The text also doesn’t tell us it was Adam necessarily invoking God. It is humans. As Brueggemann tells us, people began to intentionally rely on the Lord here.

We also don’t see a later, more generic usage. This is specifically calling on “the name” of the Lord. This is a specific knowledge of His character. In the first email in this series, I mentioned how I initially began to be fascinated with this passage and how some interpreters refer to this as the beginning of worship. We can’t worship what we don’t know. What we are invoking are the actions the Lord reveals to us.

So chew on that.

Calling on the name of the Lord. Are you starting to see this as a fundamental part of faith? A God who has revealed Himself to us. We call to get His attention and ask Him to do the things we know He does.

So here is a devotional challenge. Take time this week to specifically call on God for specific situations. Name His character and the promises of scripture. Thank Him for the ways you have experienced Him as good and ask for the same things to be done.

See you back in the next email, where we get into the book of Job, what his sin might be, and how this calling on the Lord acts in a wider Biblical idea of refuge.

Chad

Hey. I'm Chad Brooks.

I steward Productive Pastor, a podcast and community of ministry leaders focused on how productivity and strategic ministry in the average church. I write about practical approaches to ministry productivity. I also write emails about church stability/development and my own theological musics in our current social moment.

Read more from Hey. I'm Chad Brooks.

Hot Takes are a dime a dozen. I’ve got one I keep repeating in conversations. The average church in revitalization isn’t in an adaptive moment. Adaptive change and challenges have been a raging conversation for over a decade. Since then, it has turned into a talking point for the evangelical world as well. Marty Linksy and Ronald Heifetz, two Harvard scholars, created the model in the 90’s. My mainline tribe picked it up in the late 2010’s with Tod Bolsinger’s book Canoeing the Mountains. I...

This past week, I read Lovett Weems’ new book, An Aura of Hope. Weems has been a voice in United Methodist Church Renewal for decades and established the Lewis Center for Church Leadership in 2003. His voice has always been welcome. This isn’t a book review, but I did take plenty of great notes on the book. What I want to share with you today is a specific focus from An Aura of Hope that I find in my work with local churches. Difficult conversations are necessary for churches to adapt and...

For the past year, I’ve been on a personal tear about the church and social media. For the gist of it, here’s a video about one of the biggest mistakes I see churches make. The TLDR is that many pastors and other leaders in normal-size churches don’t understand how the algorithm drives Facebook, to really get traction, you have to pay to play, and the realization that many churches' posting strategies are actually HURTING their ability to reach people on Social Media. What’s the biggest...